Australia: A new law to ban children under 16 from social media

As various governments consider imposing restrictions on social media access, the Australian Government is moving to the next stage with its new social media age limit legislation, which will see users under 16 banned from using any social media app in the nation.

en-20241107-131648-131827-cs.jpg
Source: ITN

Though the specifics here remain opaque, despite the government looking to lock in new regulations as soon as possible.

This week, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced the next stage of Australia’s teen social media restrictions, explaining that:

“Social media is doing harm to our kids, and I’m calling time on it. I’ve spoken to thousands of parents, grandparents, aunties and uncles. They, like me, are worried sick about the safety of our kids online, and I want Australian parents and families to know that the government has your back.”

Albanese says that young people are being exposed to harmful depictions of body image and behavior online, which is having real world impacts. And as such, young people need to be limited in their access to such.

Albanese admits that the new laws, which will face a final vote this week, won’t stop all youngsters from accessing all social media apps. But he compares these new age limits to alcohol restrictions, which kids are sometimes still able to subvert.

“The laws set the parameters for our society, and they assist in ensuring the right outcomes.”

The laws look set to secure final approval from Parliament shortly, however some key gaps remain in Australia’s regulatory and enforcement approach.

The main challenge lies in restricting access, and the enforcement of such, given the many vectors to kids to access social media content online.

The proposed policy puts the onus on the platforms themselves to enforce age limits, and to put systems in place to stop youngsters from accessing their apps. However, social platforms already have age limits for access, and those are often subverted by underage users.

And while the platforms are working on new processes to improve this (Instagram announced just last week that it’s now using AI to detect underage users), given that there’s no foolproof system to limit such, it’ll be difficult for the Australian Government to implement penalties for the same.

Australia’s eSafety Office is reportedly exploring new age detection measures to assist in enforcement, though nothing has been officially tabled as yet. And without an agreed external measure for such, it does seem like the platforms themselves will have a strong argument to counter any punishments under this new law.

There’s also a question as to which platforms will qualify, and which will be excluded under this policy. The government has specifically tagged Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, and YouTube at this stage, though questions will be raised over whether Pinterest, for example, should also be included, or Reddit, which is a social platform, but has far fewer active users.

There will also be rising apps which pose similar risks, and will likely see bigger take-up among teens as a result of this push, and if the legislation relies on a user count threshold, or for platforms to be specifically named in the documentation, that could also pose challenges to enforcement.

Essentially, without agreed, enforceable measures in place, this is unlikely to be an effective deterrent to teen social media engagement, and will more likely push teens to more private sharing platforms, where exposure could be just as risky.

Indeed, while Snapchat, for example, is a key connector for teens, if Snap’s forced to enact more measures to block younger users from its app, those users will just move to WhatsApp instead, or some other new player that’s outside the range of the legislation. WhatsApp’s age limit is 13, but again, there’s no perfect system to stop youngsters getting online. And if teens have to set up new networks to align with these rules, they will, likely in secure, encrypted chats that the government has no way of accessing.

So while I understand the intent of this push, and the need for measures to protect young users, I don’t see how this is going to be effective.

But then again, the alternative is to do nothing, and let youngsters keep facing potential harms in social apps. In that sense, it’s good that governments are exploring their options.

But given the important role that social platforms play for teens, and enabling their social connections, they’ll find a way to stay connected, one way or another.

Parliaments

Singapore proposes new law to curb bank scams
Parliaments

Singapore proposes new law to curb bank scams

Singapore’s Protection from Scams Bill, presented to Parliament on November 11, proposes an unprecedented measure allowing police to issue Restriction Orders (RO) on suspected scam accounts. If it is passed, Singapore will be the first country to grant police authority to intervene in bank transactions to prevent fraud.

UK introduces new law to protect seafarer employment rights
Parliaments

UK introduces new law to protect seafarer employment rights

According to Nautilus International, the Employment Rights Bill is expected to introduce new protections specifically devised for seafarers, toughening the laws around collective dismissal, and cementing seafarer wage protections in UK law. The Bill, being introduced to Parliament this week, will seek to outlaw fire and rehire by requiring employers to prove there is no reasonable financial alternative to letting staff go.

Canada approves new law to develop offshore wind on its Atlantic coast
Parliaments

Canada approves new law to develop offshore wind on its Atlantic coast

Canada’s Senate has approved a new law, named bill C-49, which is set to unlock the country’s offshore renewable energy potential in the provinces of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador, on Canada’s Atlantic coast. The bill, which includes the production of wind power as well as hydrogen, now awaits royal ascent.